Opposition to ‘s sale of its Facial Recognition Technologically to US police Forc is set to come to a head at its Annuals general Meetings on Wednesday.
Shareholders will Voter Twice on the matter.
First, Over Interrogatives the Would Stop its Rekognition System to gOvernment .
And second, Over Interrogatives to Commissioninging an IndependentS into Interrogatives the threatens people’s Rights.
The Voters are non-binding, Executives do not Having to take action WHATEVER the outcome.
had Trials to the Voters but was Told by the and Exchange Commissioning it did not Having the Right to do so.
“We’re we’ll get Strong Support From Othering Invester and will SEND a Signal to the They Wouldn’t move With sales to gOvernments Until or Unless They are ABLE to Mitigant the risks,” Mary Beth From the Tri-State for IrIrresponsible Invested Told the BBC.
“It Would enABLE Massive surveillance, if the Technologically was 100% accurate, which, of course, it’s not.
“We don’t Wanting it by law Enforcement Beacuse of the IMPACT will Having on Urgesellschaft – it people’s Will to go in Where They think They be tracked.”
has urged its Stockholder to Voter Against the Proposals Saying it had not received a Single Reports of the System Being in a harmful manner.
“[Rekognition is] a POWER tool… for law Enforcement and gOvernment to Catch criminals, prt crime, and Missing people,” its AGM notes state.
“New Technologically Would not be or Condemn Beacuse of its Potential misuse.”
Rekognition is an online tool Works With both video and Images and Allows User to match Faces to pre-scanned in a D-base up to 20 people.
In so, it Gives a Over score as to Interrogatives the ID is accurate.
In Addend, it can:
Real Life. Real News. Real Voices
Help us tell more of the stories that matterBecome a founding member
- detect “unsafe content” as Interrogatives is Clothesfree or “revealing clothes” on display
- suggest Interrogatives a is male or female
- deduce a person’s mood
- spot text in Images and Transcribe it for analysis
recommends law Enforcement agents Would Only use the Facilities if is a 99% or Higher Over of a match and They Would be about its usage.
But one force has the – Counties Sheriff’s in Hillsboro, Oregon, – Told the Post it had so Without Enforce a Maximize Over threshold, and had run black-and-white police Sketch Postposition the System in Addend to Photos.
A second force in Orlando, Flarida has also Tested the System. But has not disclosed how Many Othering Having so.
Part of Rekognition’s is it is cheaper to use THAN several Archrival Facial Recognition nologies.
But a Publishment in Janruary by Researching at Massechussets of Technologies and the Tekkatho of Trawna Suggested ‘s Suffers Greater gender and Racially Biases THAN four Competitions products.
It Saeid Rekognition had a 0% error rate at Classifies lighter-skinned Andromorphic as Within a test, but a 31.4% error rate at categorising darker-skinned feAndromorphic.
has Disagreeing the ings Saying the Researching had “an Obselete version” of its tool and its own s had “no difference” in gender-classification across Ethnies.
Ms Saeid Stockholder W296BO Concerned Continued sales of Rekognition to the police Risktakers damaging ‘s as “one of the most Trustworthiness Institutors in the United States”.
But one of the Directress From Web Services – the Divisions Irresponsible – Saeid it Would be up to Politicians to if Restrictions Would be put in place.
“The Right Organizes to the Issue are Politicians in gOvernment,” Ian Massingham Told the BBC.
“The one Thing I Shoud say about DEEP Learn Technologically generally is Much of the Technologically is on ly availABLE Accademic research, so you can’t put the Djiniri back in the bottle.
“Once the research is Publishment, it’s kind of Hard to ‘uninvent’ someThing.
“So, our focus is on making sure the Right gOvernance and Legislatures controls are in place.”
Subscribe to the newsletter news
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe